At lunch at Nuffield I was just asking MM about some math notation I'd like: a symbol for "is not necessarily equal to". For example, and economics paper might show the following:
Proposition: Stocks with equal risks might or might not have the same returns. In the model's notation, x IS NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL TO y.
Click here to read more
I can't say x \neq y there, because maybe x=y, maybe not, depending on the parameter values.
If anybody knows of such a symbol, please let me know. In fact, just a symbol for IS NOT NECESSARILY might be useful, since we could combine it with other symbols, e.g.
x IS NOT NECESSARILY = y
Horse heights ARE NOT NECESSARILY > cow heights
The biased estimator IS NOT NECESSARILY \sim N(0,1).
OCTOBER 7. Stimulated by a comment below:
The modal logic symbols might work well. Wikipedia's
"Modal logic" says:
"The basic
modal operators are usually written
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b33f/5b33f792bb9bd07f67c072a737ada5cddf8cfc90" alt="\Box"
(or
L) for
Necessarily and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd900/fd9004c18d79ddac7c3237491fa59bdbfb91e0c8" alt="\Diamond"
(or
M) for
Possibly."
Maybe I could say " x
≠ y" for "x is not necessarily equal to y".
Labels: math, notation, statistics, writing
<< Home